25 June 2012

Injustice on God's Part?



A while ago, a fellow named John Moore, in a response he gave to me in a discussion regarding whether or not God is in control of the evil that occurs and whether or not he acts based not on the actions of men but rather out of the supreme council of his will said,

“Your idea of God makes Him the most unholy being in the universe- the cause of all wickedness and misery.... Shame on you.”

Similarly, Jeremy Hiltz, a friend of Mr. Moore, in an article titled “Unconditional Reprobation: A Divine Injustice states that,

Certainly, a person ordained from all eternity to be punished without any reference to their moral choices is far from justice. Surely no one would condone a man being punished for the good pleasure of a totalitarian dictator without any regard to criminal charges. Such behavior would immediately be repudiated by anyone familiar with Biblical justice. (Paragraph 7:Sentances 4-6).(Full Article Found Here)[1]

First of all, it is completely fallacious, to think that if God does something only for his pleasure then he is the same as a human dictator who does something for his own pleasure. God is God and is pleasure is by nature “good,” and since he is God, he has the Divine right to do anything he wants merely for his good pleasure. The mere pleasure of a totalitarian dictator would not be “good pleasure.” Don’t make Equivocations between God’s pleasure and man’s pleasure.

Secondly, Equal Ultimacy, that is, the doctrine that God with equal and, in both cases, positive force saves and damns, is a fallacy and not representative of the Reformed position.

Thirdly, as will be demonstrated, active punishment is entirely conditioned upon the actions of the criminal and the charges placed upon them due to their willful violation of God’s law. This statement by Mr. Hiltz is an example building a giant straw man and trying to blow it down with a bendy straw, the opponent isn’t real, and the attack is ridiculous.


            Paul deals directly with the doctrine of Election in the ninth chapter of his letter to the Romans. Romans 9:6-13 demonstrate to us that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob became what they were by way of election.

But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but “Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.” This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring. For this is what the promise said: “About this time next year I will return, and Sarah shall have a son.” 10 And not only so, but also when Rebekah had conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac, 11 though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad—in order that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls12 she was told, “The older will serve the younger.” 13 As it is written, “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated” (Romans 9:6-13) (Emphasis added).

Abraham was taken by God from Ur, and given a promise of seed, which was realized in Isaac. And when Isaac the promised son, had born children by Rebekah, Paul tells us clearly that God chose Jacob over Esau though they were not yet born, before they had done anything either good or bad. Why did he do this? Paul answers,

“..in order that God’s purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls- she was told, “The older shall serve the younger” (9:11c-12)

Not because of works, but because of him who calls.” And all of this to serve the purpose of God’s election! It is election that is not conditioned upon the actions of him(Jacob) to whom it is given. In other words…. Unconditional Election

Is there injustice on God’s part Mr. Hiltz or Mr. Moore, for having mercy on some and not on others, before they had done anything, either good or bad? By no means! For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.”

16 So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy. (Romans 9:16)

Reprobation is the necessary correlation to Election. When one is chosen, it follows of logical necessity and biblical revelation that at least one is not. While the decision to positively exercise mercy on one person over another (Election) and therefore passively leave the other to his own devices (Reprobation) is unconditional, and therefore “grace,”[2] and no-grace respectively, the execution of Justice and punishment is certainly conditioned upon human activity. All are under the bondage of sin and will come from the womb willfully sinning (Psa. 58:3), willfully following the lusts and desires of their hearts (Eph. 2:1-3) and continue willfully sinning every minute until they die; unless God at some point steps in and exercises mercy on them. His mercy is grounded in his eternal election (Eph. 1:4-12), because they must be actively given to Christ (John 6: 37-44) who was slain before the foundation of the world (Rev. 13:8). For those however whom he has not chosen before the foundation of the world, they continue[3] as they are wont to do, and God exercises justice and punishment on them because of their willful sin. Those who receive punishment are entirely responsible for their actions and their rejection of the knowledge of God given to them (Rom. 1:18-32; 6:23), they are judged for their sinful actions and the sinful intention of their hearts. They are not judged on the basis of reprobation. Reprobation means they will certainly sin, but they do not sin because of the reprobation. They sin because it is their nature to sin and they want to sin. Then on the basis of their willful sin and rebellion, God judges them. Is God unjust for not electing them? No! Certainly not! “What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God's part? By no means! For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” Is he unjust for not electing someone before they do anything either good or bad? No! Certainly not! Justice is the foundation of God’s throne (Psa. 89:14) and his election and reprobation of Jacob and Essau (recall, before they were born) in Romans 9 are, and must be, examples of his Just rule.

In verse 14 of Roamans 9, Paul anticipates the objection to his teaching of election. The objection might go, “So, if God chooses people before they are born, not based on anything they do, just to serve his “election” then he is unjust!”

14 What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God's part? By no means! 15 For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” (Romans 9:14-15)

“By no means!” I propose that if the reader finds themselves proposing the assertion that the Apostle directly refutes, then their belief on the subject is contrary to the Apostle’s, and they need to conform their understanding to the testimony of Scripture.
Such statements as those above show a complete lack of understanding as to the Reformed position as well as the Biblical revelation. Salvation is from start to finish entirely the work of God, and therefore all boasting in man is excluded. Our only position is humility, and thankfulness to God for not leaving us to our own devices, but for graciously and lovingly paying for our trespasses and forgiving us, leading us to repentance and faith and teaching us to love him and holding us up through the entire sanctification process until we reach glorification in the end, and for allowing us former children of wrath (Eph. 2:3) to become children of mercy who are partners with God in the demonstration of his glory and justice, and coregents with our Lord Jesus over the redeemed creation.

“For by grace you have been, saved through faith and this is not your own doing, it is the gift of God, not a result of works so that no one may boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.”
(Ephesians 2:8-10)



[1] Article Location:    http://www.mediafire.com/?zfd5k01smkc4tkg
[2] If grace were given based on a prerequisite condition, it would not be grace, it would be a wage. Conditional grace is not grace at all.
[3]  As a result of the Curse in Gen. 3; see also Romans 5:12  

No comments:

Post a Comment